Mine Water Filling Strategy

Anglesea mine pit aerial

The key remaining aspect of the Draft Mine Rehabilitation and Closure Plan is an approved strategy to fill and maintain the mine pit with water. While we have investigated a range of potential options to support filling the mine pit in a timely manner, an approved strategy remains outstanding.

We acknowledge the importance of this matter to the community and will continue to engage as we undertake investigations to deliver the best possible outcome for the future of the site, the community and the environment.

About the Strategy

Approximately 18 gigalitres of water is needed to fill the mine pit. As of November 2024 there is approximately three and a half gigalitres of water present.

Our preferred option is for a fast fill strategy to fill the mine pit over seven to ten years by supplementing the natural filling of the mine with a combination of Upper Eastern View Formation groundwater and peak flows from Salt Creek.

The fast fill strategy is currently subject to a groundwater licence amendment application (details below), however no active work is being undertaken on the option to use peak flows from Salt Creek as this will be determined as part of the final Mine Rehabilitation and Closure Plan.

This strategy will support a critical fire break to minimise the fire risk to the Anglesea township and potential benefits to the environment, the regional economy and the community from the future land use of the rehabilitated landscape.

The alternative is to continue with a natural fill, which may take up to 50 years and will not support the broader outcomes expected by the community and government in a timely manner.

The strategy is independent of whether the Eden Project Anglesea concept or other future land use concepts are realised.

Groundwater Pumping Test

In 2021 we completed a groundwater pumping test to provide Alcoa, regulators and the community with science-based information to determine whether groundwater can be used to fill the mine pit without adverse impact on groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River.

The rigorous process was overseen by Victorian government agencies and departments. Importantly, the data gathered during the pumping test did not identify any adverse impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River.

During the test regular updates were provided to the community and key stakeholders. Those published updates can be seen here.

The test was undertaken by expert hydrogeologists, with oversight by a co-regulator technical working group comprising representatives from Southern Rural Water, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA), Corangamite Catchment Management Authority, EPA Victoria, Earth Resources Regulation and Barwon Water.

The data retrieved was used to update the Anglesea Groundwater Model in conjunction with Barwon Water and was independently reviewed by a Technical Review Panel established by DEECA.

Together with the Anglesea Groundwater Model, the data was also used to inform a groundwater impact and environmental risk assessment undertaken by Alcoa. This revealed a sustainable pumping rate that does not adversely impact groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River, can be achieved.

Groundwater Licence Amendment Application

Alcoa submitted a formal groundwater licence amendment application with Southern Rural Water in July 2024 requesting approval to pump groundwater from the Upper Eastern View Formation (UEVF) to fill the mine pit in seven to ten years.

The amended application seeks 1.5 gigalitres per year for up to 10 years - a volume that represents less than 0.1 per cent of the aquifer’s total groundwater content and 60 per cent less than the company’s historical extraction rate.

If approved, the licence will enable Alcoa to accelerate the return of the former mine and power station site to the community while providing long-term environmental benefits sooner - in contrast to a natural fill approach which may take up to 50 years.

The decision to submit the licence application was made following consideration of feedback received during three well-attended community open house sessions and is backed by more than four years’ technical work.

This rigorous process included analysis of hydrogeological models, actual historical data, independent technical studies, groundwater pumping tests, as well as the development of a groundwater model in conjunction with Barwon Water - all of which have indicated the proposed extraction would have no adverse impact on groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River.

The application forms part of Alcoa’s ongoing efforts to finalise an approved mine water filling strategy to fill the mine pit in a timely manner and subsequently accelerate the return of the site to the community.

Discussion Board

We have listed the top questions asked about the mine water filling strategy below. If you have a question about the strategy or any other aspect of our rehabilitation activities, please email angleseaps@alcoa.com.au.

Throughout the project we have investigated a wide range of options to support filling the mine pit in a timely manner including restoration of Salt Creek, recycled water, Lower Eastern View Formation (LEVF) groundwater, seawater and desalination.

Investigations and modelling into a natural fill have indicated it may take up to 50 years to fill. During this time community access to the area would remain restricted.

The only current feasible options are the potential use of Upper Eastern View Formation (UEVF) groundwater or natural fill.

Our investigations have involved comprehensive scientific and technical testing to ensure the approach is responsible, best addresses environmental considerations and delivers the best community outcomes.

We have a regulatory obligation to develop the final Anglesea Mine Rehabilitation and Closure Plan. The mine water filling strategy is independent of whether the Eden Project Anglesea concept or other future land use concepts are realised.

We have undertaken extensive technical work to assess the feasibility of using groundwater to fill the mine pit.

Spanning almost four years, this rigorous process has included analysis of hydrogeological models, actual historical data, independent technical studies and groundwater pumping tests as well as the development of a groundwater model in conjunction with Barwon Water. These have all confirmed the proposed extraction would have no adverse impact on groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River.

Similarly, historical studies commissioned by Victorian government agencies determined our operations have had no negative impact on the health of the Anglesea River.

We understand the health of the Anglesea River is an important issue to the community.

Throughout mine rehabilitation and closure works, rigorous scientific and technical testing has been conducted to ensure our chosen approach is environmentally responsible and safe for the community.

Results of this testing and analysis indicate that the acidity of the Anglesea River is influenced by naturally occurring factors.

Soil surrounding the river and the peat swamps within the river catchments naturally contain acid sulphate materials. During periods of drying and heavy rain, water flows through the soil and peats and into the river - affecting its pH levels.

Our activities have been subject to many independent technical studies and all have found that we have had no adverse impact on groundwater dependent ecosystems, including the Anglesea River.

Creation of a water body benefits the environment, the regional economy and the community. It also creates a critical fire break to minimise fire risk to the Anglesea township and assists geotechnical stability through the weight of water at the base of the mine.

Over 30 million tonnes of soil would be needed to fill the mine pit. Sourcing and transporting this large quantity would create significant environmental and safety issues.

Filling the mine pit with soil would also remove the fire break that the mine now in part provides the township of Anglesea (a recommendation from the 2015 Anglesea Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry).

We hosted a mine site tour for members of the RMIT team to help inform their Regenerative Transformation Lab concept. We continue to stay informed about possible future land uses for the area through this and other interesting concepts.

Under our regulatory obligation, we are focused on finalising an appropriate mine water filling strategy to deliver a final Mine Rehabilitation and Closure Plan.

Following successful rehabilitation of the former mine area, this large portion of land will be returned to the State who will determine its long-term use.

We are committed to achieve this in a way that enhances and protects the environment, does not preclude any appropriate long-term uses and is in line with Alcoa’s guiding principles developed with the community.

This will enable the State to make decisions regarding use of the area which we believe will be consistent with the Anglesea Futures Plan (DELWP) published in 2018.

While Alcoa has not provided a written response to Professor Ralf Haese, our team and hydrogeologist have discussed the paper at length over many collective hours with the Professor and representatives from the Friends of Anglesea River group.